How are we working together?
The Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Branch continues to advance Indigenous consultation and collaboration with partners through a distinctions-based approach that supports the co-development of the Anti-Racism Action Plan, as mandated by the Anti-Racism Act. Over the reporting period, the branch gathered draft commitments from across the provincial government for the Indigenous-specific racism stream of the Action Plan. Maintaining openness, transparency and fostering strong relationships with Indigenous partners remain central to this work.
Indigenous partners reviewed the draft actions and provided advice and guidance. The branch engaged in ongoing discussions and written communication with partners to shape the draft Action Plan. At the same time, designated ministries were conducting their own Indigenous consultation and collaboration on their proposed anti-racism commitment for inclusion in the Action Plan. Information on the ministries’ Indigenous partners was shared with the branch’s partners to support alignment and understanding.
The ongoing conversations with partners continue to inform priorities and guide the upcoming phases in the implementation of the Anti-Racism Action Plan.
Next steps include sharing the final Action Plan with partners and continuing co-development of the assessment framework that will support performance measurement and reporting.
Are there challenges?
Engagement with Indigenous partners continues to guide development of the Anti-Racism Action Plan. Advancing this work requires coordination across the provincial government to ensure alignment and clarity throughout the development process. Staffing pressures related to labour action this past fall, along with competing priorities across ministries, have contributed to slower internal processes, and impacted timelines.
Despite these constraints, the branch remains committed to transparent communication and meaningful collaboration with Indigenous partners. Ongoing engagement through meetings and correspondence supports shared understanding and helps ensure that Indigenous partner perspectives are reflected in the plan and its implementation.
The Action Plan is scheduled for public release by June 1, 2026, in accordance with the legislated deadline. Compressed timelines, as well as resource and fiscal pressures, have at times affected the pace of information sharing, feedback collection and engagement with partners during the final stages of development. The branch recognizes the impact of these challenges and continues to provide timely updates where delays occur.
Consistent with a distinctions-based approach, engagement is tailored to the unique perspectives and priorities of each partner. This includes direct dialogue to discuss specific elements of draft actions and their potential impacts, recognizing that these may differ across partners.
Highlights
Over the past year, the branch has conducted Indigenous consultation and co-operation using a distinctions-based approach to support the co-development of the Anti-Racism Action Plan. This work has strengthened relationships with Indigenous partners and enhanced ongoing communication throughout the development process.
The branch has worked with public bodies to identify and advance key actions and initiatives addressing anti-Indigenous racism across the provincial government for inclusion in the plan. The branch has supported alignment across participating ministries by sharing best practices for Indigenous consultation and co-operation, enabling ministry-specific Indigenous engagement to proceed alongside the Ministry of Attorney General’s.
Through ongoing meetings, dialogue and correspondence, Indigenous partners have provided valuable guidance and direction. This input has been shared across ministries to inform and refine proposed actions and ensure that the action plan reflects priorities identified by Indigenous partners. This process has also contributed to building trust and supporting more responsive and informed policy development.
While the work involves multiple partners, evolving requirements and interconnected timelines, progress remains steady. Scheduling pressures are actively managed, and implementation remains on track as cross-ministry collaboration continues.


